4194
Points
Questions
11
Answers
381
-
Because the event executes other processes there is no way for the event to know if those processes fail or not. The way we have tackled this is to add the notification into the process so once it finishes an email is executed. With this methodology we can not only validate that the process executed properly yet also that the data validated accurately.
- 1835 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 2074 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 4304 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 1725 views
- 5 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 1725 views
- 5 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 1725 views
- 5 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 1972 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 1848 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
Honestly Paritosh I have seen this handled in a few ways. Having many conversations where admins point to the out-of-box reports. Others using a series of complex spreadsheets to manage. Personally I have even considered creating a second database to track all the joins and dependencies. At the end of the day this is a fairly large commitment and you will need to ask yourself if all the work is worth the benefit. Even though Admins struggle at times, they always seem to overcome so there has never been a sufficient ROI to pursue this rigorously.
- 2841 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes
-
Prior to 9.x I used to integrate using Sierra Atlantic’s (now Hitachi Consulting) SCMnet yet I believe that has gone the way of the dinosaur but is still available. It used to just drill into the ENG MODULE and ITEM MASTER.
Here’s an article
- 2629 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes