@Patrick – if your talking ‘AND’ logic and true parallel approval task no. You can use the approach described by Madhusudanas as serial OR logic to give alternat pathways through the work flow.

Not fully clear but suspect the question asked required true parallel ‘AND’ logic in the workflow.

Regards
AK

Short answer is yes there will be an impact, the parts will likely have relationships in the data to changes, history table, a whole bunch of stuff which will be broken. Sounds like a bad idea to me.  What wrong with obsoleting them and leaving them in the database?

AK

We use the XPLM  one with Creo, works fine. Can’t say how well it plugs into Solidworks that probably as much to do with the API SW make available as anything else. Not sure if they do an NX integration but in general XPLM stuff is done and works well in my opinion.

For anyone to provide usable help, your going to have to provide more detail on your agile set up. 
What Agile version you running.
What OS
What hardware configs, do they meet the minimum recommend in the hardware sizing
What is the DB size.

You can tune weblogic / DB  but if your running it on under powered hardware or insufficient memory your going to struggle to improve.

Try running jconsole for your JDK see what that tells you about the JVM health.
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/e13814/jvm_tuning.htm#PERFM153

Have you looked at the logs?

Would you not be better raising a service request with Oracle if you think you have found a bug. Rather than posting to an user advice forum.

But, you’re right shouldn’t happen though.

I guess it what you mean as implemented.  We stores FMEA output as documents and use our change process to release and revise  them when there is a significant chnage or rerun of the FMEA.  

We don’t have project management, but I guess setting up a small project to contain any mitigating actions as project tasks could make more of the FMEA process live within Agile rather than just capture the output.

AK

I think at the integration level you could only turn viewables on check in all the parts you want it to create them form then turn it off and then check in the rest.

What integration as our users can turn ‘viewable’ creation on and off as required in the preferences dialog. We use XPLM integration to CREO but are currently 9.3.3.

Matt post is true, but you have to add the changes to be reported on when you execute (5.3.3) , our query based solution came for m the desire to automatically generate reports and deliver unattended. Should have made that clear.

Hi Nelly,

File load can update attributes (f;ex fields) you have enabled when you loading files by using attribute name / value pairs in the index file, but AFAIK you can’t use File Load or import to change attachment attributes as a separate process after the attachment is created.

From the import / export guide:

ITEM,P00010,,C:/temp/logo_color.bmp,FILE,Description=”Fileload,Test”,Date01=12/12/00,List01=Select1,Text01=”Test_Fileload”,Text02=DFSF<CR>

AK