741
Points
Questions
5
Answers
96
-
- 562 views
- 3 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 500 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 870 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes
-
Hello,
Please check below documentation:
7.2.4.6 Signoff DurationSignoff Duration data is recorded for statuses that have reviewers: Review-type statuses and Release-type statuses. Signoff Duration records time in a manner similar to a stop watch or timer. The recorded time indicates either how long each reviewer has been able to signoff the change for that status, but has not yet done so, or the number of days it took the reviewer to signoff the change for that status.
Signoff Duration is recorded for each user in days. It is the lesser of:
Time since the change entered the workflow status. The time is recorded for the most recent entry into the status.
Time since the user was last added to this workflow status.
The Signoff Duration timer begins recording duration time when the user becomes a reviewer, either when the change enters the signoff status or the user is added as a reviewer to the signoff status.
The signoff duration timer continues to increment one day at a time. The timer freezes when:
The reviewer signs off the change for that status.
The change exits that status
If the change enters a specific signoff status multiple times, then a separate duration is recorded for each time the change enters the status.
Signoff Duration time is recorded in days. When a change enters a signoff status, if a reviewer signs off within the first 24 hours, then the Signoff Duration time is recorded as 0 (zero).
Regards,Swagoto- 778 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 362 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
Hi Sowjanya,
Please review this Oracle doc related to this issue:
While Importing Items, Page Two Fields Are Required For Subclasses Where Field Is Hidden (Doc ID 1670013.1)Enhancement requests were open but Oracle rejected them saying it’s not feasible.
Regards,
Swagoto- 567 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 504 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 769 views
- 2 answers
- 0 votes
-
- 936 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes
-
Hi,
I’ve come across/ worked in at least two systems which implemented SAML 2.0 SSO with Agile 9.3.6, so yes it’s possible to implement it successfully. However, if you ask me for the steps, I’ll be unable to provide you that since I don’t have hands on experience in setting up SAML 2.0, I have only worked with NTLM SSO.
- 631 views
- 1 answers
- 0 votes